Imagine a compliance platform is $12,000 a year. How much is it?
The answer is contingent on what it is replacing.
If you invest $12,000 to save hundreds of hours collecting evidence in the complex technological world that could be well invested. If a seven person startup could have the same proof in two hours per month, the cost will be different.
It’s a great method to begin your look for Vanta. Don’t begin by asking what platform comes with the greatest features. Find out how your company’s tools can help you save time and money.
Automation has an economic break-even Factor
It’s not intrinsically either good or bad. Its value varies with the size. Imagine a technology company which is expanding, multiple cloud environments, many applications and frequent changes to access. The task of collecting evidence over time could become extremely high. Integrations that automately monitor systems and gather evidence could quickly justify their cost.
Imagine a startup of 10 people who are preparing to go through its initial SOC 2. audit. Imagine a startup having 10 employees in preparation for its first SOC 2.
That difference matters when evaluating Vanta pricing. The capabilities of a modern platform are impressive, however they can only be of value for organizations that require them.
Compare Architecture and not just Brands
The search for Vanta or Drata quickly becomes a feature-by -feature search. It is essential to look at the features, services and contracts offered by each platform. Both are established platform for compliance, which focuses on automation and integrations.
It’s important to choose the other thing first. Do you think your business is ready for an integration-driven platform for compliance at all? Some companies prefer continuous monitoring or automated evidence collection and automated evidence gathering. Others prefer to present evidence themselves, particularly when the work load is not too heavy.
Vanta Competitors aren’t all following the exact same guidelines.
A number of well-known Vanta competitors compete within the same automation-oriented category. There are other platforms that focus on organization over the vast system connectivity.
CertAssist is a part of this group. CertAssist, created by compliance consultants, internal auditors and other professionals, organizes the controls frameworks in a central workspace. It lets you edit policies and guidance for evidence, and allows auditors to examine evidence with read-only access.
It doesn’t set up agents or connect to the infrastructure system. Customers are able to upload the evidence they’ve chosen.
System Access is a consideration in the Decision
Removal of integrations comes with an obvious drawback: you have to gather evidence manually.
This removes the requirement to integrate, and the process of compliance is not dependent on a connection to the operational environment.
Neither architecture is universally superior. It is essential to inquire which choices are best for your particular business.
CertAssist aims at teams that have between five and 200 employees and offers pricing information instead of having a sales conversation. The price for its launch is $225 per month, in contrast to a typical price of $375 per month.
Let Complexity earn its place
The requirements of a 10 person start-up today might not necessarily match its needs at 100 or 500 employees.
A simple platform could make sense if compliance remains simple. As employees, systems, frameworks, and requirements for evidence expand, the economics may eventually favor deeper automation. It is better to let the complexity of technology for compliance to earn its place.
Don’t buy fifty different integrations just because they appear impressive in the comparison chart. It is best to pay for them only if the cost to do the job they replace by hand is greater.